有video难道他没看?这是法官枉法。


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: ASH 于 2014-11-14, 13:27:44:

回答: 法官混帐。 由 whoami 于 2014-11-14, 13:07:49:

Streetsblog has reported before that, at least in some cases, the DMV adjudication process relies mainly on testimony from drivers involved in fatal crashes, not police reports or other evidence.

这更是混帐话:

引用:
DMV is an administrative agency and has no authority with regard to law enforcement or criminal prosecution.

说的就是你管得了的tickets,扯什么狗屁criminal prosecution,难道不够criminal prosecution就traffick tickets也一并取消?




所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码: 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容: (BBCode使用说明