Atificial photosynthesis突破, 但我不明白为何用细菌还叫人工光合作用
所有跟贴
·
加跟贴
·
新语丝读书论坛
送交者: silxirt 于 2015-04-17, 16:09:24:
http://www.valuewalk.com/2015/04/artificial-photosynthesis-study/
所有跟贴:
细读了一下,说是人工光合是因为细菌,尽管来自大自然,不能光合
-
silxirt
(227 bytes)
2015-04-18, 11:40:27
(777246)
单细胞,产率能有多高?
-
疫苗
(36 bytes)
2015-04-17, 18:41:53
(777202)
It seems to me that Dai and Yang, veterans of nano science, are entering energy
-
JZ
(77 bytes)
2015-04-17, 16:49:24
(777188)
It is not coincidence that both of them made big claims almost at the same time (无内容)
-
JZ
(0 bytes)
2015-04-17, 16:54:11
(777190)
If not in nano, they had no chance to teach at Stanford and Berkeley (无内容)
-
JZ
(0 bytes)
2015-04-17, 17:08:12
(777195)
if those 细菌 can be produced like any synthesized material, then (无内容)
-
meiyou
(0 bytes)
2015-04-17, 16:33:28
(777187)
加跟贴
笔名:
密码:
注册笔名请按这里
标题:
内容: (
BBCode使用说明
)