送交者: steven 于 2013-10-29, 16:30:38:

回答: Those 'official' numbers were probably very unreliable. 由 LB 于 2013-10-29, 15:28:16:

• I dare you say the same thing to this guy. - LB (145 bytes) 2013-10-29, 16:38:26 (730981)
  • 我想共产党的保险箱里面一定有比较准确的数据，只是不想公开罢了 (无内容) - conner (0 bytes) 2013-10-29, 22:37:01 (731001)
    • 曾经听过西方评论有关中国人口，有人认为50年代中国的人口没那么多。 - steven (74 bytes) 2013-10-30, 02:00:00 (731017)
      • 几十年的人口数字都有人口普查数据互相印证，哪有你听说的那回事。 (无内容) - Amsel (0 bytes) 2013-10-30, 23:14:20 (731053)
        • Cressey, George B. Land of the 500 Million, p. 9. 1955. - steven (62 bytes) 2013-10-31, 12:24:57 (731085)
  • 你认为他的倒数第四段靠谱吗？ (无内容) - xname4 (0 bytes) 2013-10-29, 16:56:14 (730983)
    • No. Chinese had only one way to die. - LB (14 bytes) 2013-10-29, 19:41:32 (730988)
      • It is fair to say the paper I quote was from a minor journal - steven (1388 bytes) 2013-10-29, 20:52:44 (730990)
        • I question those numbers not because they are too high, - LB (828 bytes) 2013-10-29, 21:57:19 (730992)
          • I know, but again, Heiti's was lower than Japan and the US also - steven (394 bytes) 2013-10-30, 01:56:16 (731016)
  • I told you I didn't come up with the number. - steven (81 bytes) 2013-10-29, 16:55:09 (730982)
    • I don't have problem that those numbers are problematic. (无内容) - LB (0 bytes) 2013-10-29, 17:02:10 (730985)

加跟贴