送交者: skipper3 于 2005-1-30, 00:09:14:

回答: I agree with you that ancient Chinese were poor at "算账做生意" 由 Latino2 于 2005-1-29, 23:56:11:

It's chicken-egg relation maybe. The reason why chinese “重文轻商”may be traced back to how ancient agriculture economy was operated: they probably started from something like a village where everything was a collective effort and no individual could claim the credit from harvest. This setting is reasonable for ancient agriculture, but it left no room for individualism and the respect to individual wealth.

• 一个文化的核心实际上就是如何看待两种关系： - Latino2 (499 bytes) 2005-1-30, 00:47:10
  • 人和自然的关系， 老中过去是敬畏， 现在还是敬畏; - fagus (280 bytes) 2005-1-30, 15:37:20
  • chinese's holding nature in awe and veneration is not the culprit - 匆匆过客 (427 bytes) 2005-1-30, 01:40:21
    • 敬畏自然 logically lead to 敬畏天子. - Latino2 (153 bytes) 2005-1-30, 02:02:47
      • I still don't think "敬畏天子" is the reason - 匆匆过客 (866 bytes) 2005-1-30, 02:31:29
  • regarding individualism. No matter 招待见 or not - skipper3 (494 bytes) 2005-1-30, 01:22:53
    • Nothing is black and white, everything is 算帐 or not 算帐 - 008 (12 bytes) 2005-1-30, 01:30:31
      • Yes. Only RuoZhi and terrorists don't know SuanZhang - skipper3 (0 bytes) 2005-1-30, 01:38:40
        • unfortunately every one is some kind RuoZhi and terrorist - 008 (48 bytes) 2005-1-30, 05:07:34
  • Let me speculate - skipper3 (809 bytes) 2005-1-30, 01:09:42
    • Largely true. - Latino2 (0 bytes) 2005-1-30, 02:03:40
• There was an article about china on a local paper - skipper3 (205 bytes) 2005-1-30, 00:20:15
  • Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies - Latino2 (105 bytes) 2005-1-30, 00:52:06

加跟贴