英国物理学会被迫就给议会门的证词作出澄清


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: Amsel 于 2010-03-02, 20:56:19:

引用:
The Institute's statement, which has been published both on the Institute's website and the Committee's, has been interpreted by some individuals to imply that it does not support the scientific evidence that the rising concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is contributing to global warming.

That is not the case. The Institute's position on climate change is clear: the basic science is well enough understood to be sure that our climate is changing – and that we need to take action now to mitigate that change.

http://www.iop.org/News/news_40679.html

一方面说“ It reflected our belief that the open exchange of data, procedures and materials is fundamental to the scientific process. From the information already in the public domain it appears that these principles have been put at risk in the present case, and that this has undermined the trust that is placed in the scientific process”,另一方面又坚信CRU的以前研究结论,这AGW水真够深的,IOP已经顾不上自洽了。




所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码: 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容: (BBCode使用说明